Turkish News Agency-Cyprus (TAK)
TAK
Northern Cyprus · Quick FactsSources: Law 41/2011, articles 4, 7 and 8; TAK masthead and institutional description; Official Gazette of 4 April 2018; Law 65/2025; Protocol No. 10; Reporters Without Borders 2026. Classification per the State Media Matrix. Information checked to 26 September 2026.
Typology trajectory — TAK
Northern Cyprus · 2022–2026| TAK Director, ex officio | 1 |
| BRTK Director, ex officio | 1 |
| Appointed by the President | 2 |
| Appointed by the Council of Ministers | 2 |
| Selected by the main opposition party represented in the Assembly | 1 |
| Selected by the union with the largest membership among TAK employees | 1 |
| Selected by the professional organisation with the most yellow press-card holders | 1 |
Sources: Law 41/2011, articles 4, 7 and 8; Turkish Cypriot Media Ethics Board decisions of 28 March and 22 April 2025; Gürdallı response, 22 April 2025; Law 65/2025. SC = State-Controlled, per the State Media Matrix. Information checked to 26 September 2026.
Türk Ajansı Kıbrıs, the Turkish News Agency–Cyprus, is the official news agency of the self-declared Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, recognised only by Türkiye. Based in North Nicosia, it published its first bulletin on 21 December 1973, following an initiative by the Provisional Turkish Administration of Cyprus. Its founding director was Sait Terzioğlu. Fehmi Gürdallı is Director, and Özgül Gürkut Mutluyakalı chairs its governing board.
Media assets
News agency: TAK, providing domestic and international news and supplying material to media organisations and other subscribers
Press-monitoring services: bulletins incorporating translations from Greek- and English-language newspapers
Subscribers and partners: TAK’s institutional description lists Turkish Cypriot newspapers and broadcasters, media in Türkiye, public authorities and international news organisations among its subscribers. It identifies Reuters and IRNA as international subscribers and describes cooperation agreements with Anadolu Agency, İhlas News Agency and the Azeri Press Agency.
Ownership and governance
TAK is a public-law institution with administrative autonomy, governed by Law 41/2011 on its establishment, duties and operating principles, as amended.
Article 7 provides for a nine-member Board of Directors, or Yönetim Kurulu:
| Membership or appointment route | Seats |
|---|---|
| TAK Director, ex officio | 1 |
| BRTK Director, ex officio | 1 |
| Appointed by the President | 2 |
| Appointed by the Council of Ministers | 2 |
| Selected by the main opposition party represented in the Assembly | 1 |
| Selected by the union with the largest membership among TAK employees | 1 |
| Selected by the professional organisation with the most yellow press-card holders | 1 |
Members elect the chair and deputy chair. Non-ex-officio members serve three-year terms, although appointing bodies may remove their nominees earlier.
TAK’s published masthead identifies Özgül Gürkut Mutluyakalı as Chair, Artun Çağa as Deputy Chair and Dr Fehmi Gürdallı as Director, listing nine board members.
Gürdallı succeeded Neriman Saygılı as Director in April 2018. His appointment, made by the President on the Council of Ministers’ proposal, was published in the Official Gazette of 4 April 2018. The directorship and board chairmanship are separate offices.
Source of funding and budget
TAK depends overwhelmingly on government funding, supplemented by a small amount of service income.
Its 2026 Budget Act, Law 65/2025, authorises expenditure of TRY 213,522,000. The service-income category does not provide a detailed breakdown by subscriber.
TAK approved financing, 2026
| Approved financing | TRY million | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Government contribution | 210.822 | 98.7% |
| Other service income | 2.700 | 1.3% |
| Total | 213.522 | 100% |
Sources: Law 65/2025 and the Official Gazette of 25 December 2025; Assembly approval of the 2025 budget. Information checked to 26 September 2026.
Editorial independence
TAK’s law contains express safeguards for independence and impartiality. Article 4 requires accuracy, impartiality and equal treatment. Article 8(3) declares the Board independent and prohibits outside bodies, authorities, individuals or political parties from giving orders or instructions concerning its publishing services.
Reported practice raises questions about whether those safeguards are effective. State Media Monitor’s previous assessment records local experts’ and journalists’ accounts of government control over TAK’s editorial output.
Professional ethics scrutiny has identified specific problems. The relevant body is the Turkish Cypriot Media Ethics Board, Medya Etik Kurulu, established through professional self-regulation in the north. Its findings should be attributed to that body.
On 28 March 2025 the board condemned TAK’s failure to report a teachers’ union protest outside Türkiye’s embassy in Nicosia. Its Decision 184 described the omission as unacceptable both under journalistic ethics and in relation to the public’s right to information.
On 22 April 2025 the board criticised TAK’s translation of Archbishop Georgios’s Easter message. It found that replacing a reference to occupiers with a general reference to Turks altered the context and risked encouraging hostility, and called on TAK to publish a correction.
Gürdallı disputed that finding. In his response published the same day, he maintained that the report conveyed the original meaning and that the difference did not warrant a correction.
AI and digital policy
No agency-specific, publicly available editorial policy on generative AI was identified in the materials reviewed.
Classification rationale
TAK remains classified State-Controlled (SC).
The authorities have substantial influence over its leadership and resources. Political appointments form a significant part of its governance, and government funding accounts for approximately 98.7 per cent of its approved 2026 financing.
The editorial assessment rests on reported practice despite statutory safeguards. State Media Monitor’s existing evidence records government influence over output, while the 2025 ethics findings document concerns about news selection and accuracy. The law’s explicit independence provisions must be acknowledged when explaining the classification.
September 2026
Citation (cite the article/profile as part of):
Dragomir, M. (2025). State Media Monitor Global Dataset 2025.
Media and Journalism Research Center (MJRC).
Zenodo.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17219015
This article/profile is part of the State Media Monitor Global Dataset 2025, a continuously updated dataset published by the Media and Journalism Research Center (MJRC).
