State Media Monitor

The State Media Matrix

State Media Monitor classifies every state and public media entry by three factors: who funds it, who owns and governs it, and who controls its editorial line. How the three combine places each entry in one of seven categories, from State-Controlled to Independent Public.

Three factors

Telling State-Controlled outlets apart from independent public service media is not enough to understand how state and public media work, or how their performance shifts with politics and economics. Five other models sit between those poles. The Matrix separates all seven with three questions, and a safeguard counts only where it is applied in practice.

Funding

Is the outlet predominantly funded by the state?

State and public media usually rely on public money, and some also earn commercial revenue. Direct state support, such as government subsidies or state advertising, creates dependency: the larger its share of the budget, the weaker the outlet’s independence.

In the Matrix: predominantly state-funded means direct state support of at least half of the annual budget.

Ownership and governance

Does the state own the outlet or appoint its governing bodies?

Most state media are owned by the government, and politicised appointments to governing boards are a powerful instrument of control. Where supervisory bodies are appointed by a broader set of actors, state control is weaker.

In the Matrix: majority government ownership, or a board majority appointed by the government on political grounds.

Editorial control

Does the state, or an actor linked to it, control the editorial line?

The hardest factor to assess. Editorial control exists when journalists cannot take editorial decisions independently, because of internal levers such as funding and ownership, or external pressure from officials, allied businesses and politicians.

Safeguards that count: editorial statutes that bind management, and independent oversight such as ombudspersons, programme councils and complaints mechanisms.

The matrix

Editorial control divides the seven categories into two families. Within each family, funding and ownership decide the category. Select a category to see its definition, how it scores on the three factors, its 2026 entries and examples, or answer the three questions to place an outlet.

Place an outletAnswer all three to see its category.

Is it predominantly funded by the state?

Does the state own it or appoint its governing bodies?

Does the state, or an actor linked to it, control its editorial line?

Categories that no longer fit your answers fade out.This combination is State-Controlled.This combination is Captured Public or State Managed/Owned.This combination is Captured Private.This combination is Independent State-Funded and State-Managed.This combination is Independent State-Managed.This combination is Independent State-Funded.This combination is Independent Public.

Show 2026 entries forCounts and shares in the matrix follow your choice.

Worldwide: 588 entries in the 2026 mapping.105 entries in Europe.60 entries in Eurasia.85 entries in Middle East and North Africa.145 entries in Sub-Saharan Africa.111 entries in Asia.68 entries in Latin America and the Caribbean.4 entries in North America.10 entries in Oceania.

Editorial line controlled by the state

493 entries worldwide, 83.8% of the total46 entries in Europe, 43.8% of the total58 entries in Eurasia, 96.7% of the total83 entries in Middle East and North Africa, 97.6% of the total143 entries in Sub-Saharan Africa, 98.6% of the total102 entries in Asia, 91.9% of the total57 entries in Latin America and the Caribbean, 83.8% of the total1 entries in North America, 25.0% of the total3 entries in Oceania, 30.0% of the total

Predominantly state-fundedNot predominantly state-fundedState-owned or state-appointedNo state ownership or appointments

Editorially independent

95 entries worldwide, 16.2% of the total59 entries in Europe, 56.2% of the total2 entries in Eurasia, 3.3% of the total2 entries in Middle East and North Africa, 2.4% of the total2 entries in Sub-Saharan Africa, 1.4% of the total9 entries in Asia, 8.1% of the total11 entries in Latin America and the Caribbean, 16.2% of the total3 entries in North America, 75.0% of the total7 entries in Oceania, 70.0% of the total

Predominantly state-fundedNot predominantly state-fundedState-owned or state-appointedNo state ownership or appointments

Select a category in the matrix to open its definition, its three-factor profile, its 2026 entries by region and examples.

Not independent

State-Controlled SC

The state funds the outlet, controls its governance and steers its editorial line. These outlets depend on state budgets, are run by government-appointed bodies or directly by state authorities, and follow an editorial line imposed or approved by them, often policed through censorship.

It is the most widespread model in the world and accounts for most entries in every region except Europe, North America and Oceania.

Examples in 2026

The three factors

Funding
Predominantly state-funded
Governance
State-owned or state-appointed
Editorial line
Controlled by the state or state-linked actors

Entries by region, 2026

  • Europe25
  • Eurasia48
  • Middle East and North Africa52
  • Sub-Saharan Africa122
  • Asia64
  • Latin America and the Caribbean52
  • North America1
  • Oceania3

367 entries, 62.4% of the 588 mapped worldwide.

Not independent

Captured Public or State Managed/Owned CaPu

Publicly owned or state-managed outlets whose editorial line is controlled by the government, where predominant state funding cannot be established. Many earn substantial commercial revenue, yet in content they are often hard to tell apart from State-Controlled media.

An outlet moves into the State-Controlled category once evidence shows that the state also provides most of its budget. The category includes the Gulf’s large broadcasters and, since 2026, a group of Chinese and Vietnamese outlets for which predominant state funding could not be demonstrated.

Examples in 2026

The three factors

Funding
Predominant state funding not established
Governance
State-owned or state-appointed
Editorial line
Controlled by the state or state-linked actors

Entries by region, 2026

  • Europe8
  • Eurasia6
  • Middle East and North Africa18
  • Sub-Saharan Africa15
  • Asia28
  • Latin America and the Caribbean4
  • North America0
  • Oceania0

79 entries, 13.4% of the 588 mapped worldwide.

Not independent

Captured Private CaPr

Privately owned outlets whose editorial agendas are captured through sustained ties to state authorities, governing parties or allied business groups, without state ownership or state-appointed governing bodies. Some receive state money, for example through advertising, and some do not.

The category requires persistent, systemic control of coverage by state-linked actors; political bias alone does not qualify. It is the hardest model to document, because control builds up over years and runs through intermediaries.

Examples in 2026

The three factors

Funding
Either
Governance
Privately owned
Editorial line
Controlled by the state or state-linked actors

Entries by region, 2026

  • Europe13
  • Eurasia4
  • Middle East and North Africa13
  • Sub-Saharan Africa6
  • Asia10
  • Latin America and the Caribbean1
  • North America0
  • Oceania0

47 entries, 8.0% of the 588 mapped worldwide.

Independent

Independent State-Funded and State-Managed ISFM

Owned or governed by the state and predominantly funded by it, yet editorially independent. The combination holds where strong rules, or a political culture that respects them, keep governments from using their financial and appointment powers to steer coverage.

It is the most common independent category, with most of its entries in Europe.

Examples in 2026

The three factors

Funding
Predominantly state-funded
Governance
State-owned or state-appointed
Editorial line
Independent

Entries by region, 2026

  • Europe33
  • Eurasia1
  • Middle East and North Africa2
  • Sub-Saharan Africa2
  • Asia3
  • Latin America and the Caribbean6
  • North America0
  • Oceania3

50 entries, 8.5% of the 588 mapped worldwide.

Independent

Independent State-Managed ISM

Majority state-owned or state-governed outlets that do not depend on direct state funding and keep their editorial autonomy. Their revenue comes mainly from other sources, such as advertising or a licence fee.

Of the independent hybrids, it is the closest to the Independent Public model.

Examples in 2026

The three factors

Funding
Not predominantly state-funded
Governance
State-owned or state-appointed
Editorial line
Independent

Entries by region, 2026

  • Europe9
  • Eurasia0
  • Middle East and North Africa0
  • Sub-Saharan Africa0
  • Asia2
  • Latin America and the Caribbean0
  • North America0
  • Oceania1

12 entries, 2.0% of the 588 mapped worldwide.

Independent

Independent State-Funded ISF

Predominantly funded by the state, but governed by bodies free of state appointment, and editorially autonomous.

The model is common among public broadcasters in Australia, Canada and parts of Europe, and among university broadcasters in Latin America.

Examples in 2026

The three factors

Funding
Predominantly state-funded
Governance
Free of state ownership and appointments
Editorial line
Independent

Entries by region, 2026

  • Europe5
  • Eurasia1
  • Middle East and North Africa0
  • Sub-Saharan Africa0
  • Asia0
  • Latin America and the Caribbean5
  • North America1
  • Oceania3

15 entries, 2.6% of the 588 mapped worldwide.

Independent

Independent Public IP

Public service media created by law and insulated from government. Their funding and the appointment of their governing bodies are arranged so that the government cannot use them as levers, and their editorial autonomy is protected by statutes, codes and independent oversight.

It is the strongest form of independence in the Matrix, and a rare one: 12 of its 18 entries are in Europe.

Examples in 2026

The three factors

Funding
Not predominantly state-funded
Governance
Free of state ownership and appointments
Editorial line
Independent

Entries by region, 2026

  • Europe12
  • Eurasia0
  • Middle East and North Africa0
  • Sub-Saharan Africa0
  • Asia4
  • Latin America and the Caribbean0
  • North America2
  • Oceania0

18 entries, 3.1% of the 588 mapped worldwide.

Reading the matrix

Figures are for the 2026 cycle, which maps 588 entries in 168 jurisdictions.

Two poles

State-Controlled media, the most widespread model, account for 367 of the 588 entries. Independent Public media, built to serve the public with funding and governance kept out of the government’s reach, number 18, 12 of them in Europe.

Five hybrids

Three hybrids keep their editorial autonomy despite state funding, state ownership or both. Two captured models have their editorial line controlled by the state without the full State-Controlled combination: Captured Public media, which the state governs without predominantly funding them, and Captured Private media, which it does not own at all.

Capture without ownership

The 47 Captured Private entries cluster in a few countries: Serbia and Turkey, which hold all 13 in Europe, Iran’s Revolutionary Guards-linked titles, Cambodia, Tanzania and Russia. Capture can also unravel: after Hungary’s change of government in April 2026, nine Hungarian entries, eight of them Captured Private, left the mapping because the state links behind their classification had changed or largely disappeared.

How classifications change

Each entry is assessed against the three factors in every cycle, using annual reports, legal acts, financial records, media and NGO reporting, academic research and interviews. New accounts, appointment records, corporate filings or a change of government can move an entry to another category, or out of the mapping, without any change in its editorial behaviour. The typology was first published on State Media Monitor in May 2022.

Global List — Call to Action

Apply the typology

See how every outlet is categorized.

The seven models above map onto real broadcasters, agencies and publishers worldwide. To find the category assigned to any individual state or public media outlet in this project, search the Global List.

Search the Global List
The spectrum, recapped
Controlled · total state control
Hybrid · five mixed models
Independent · genuine autonomy