Iceland
Europe · Northern Europe
1 ISFM
One entry, in the independent family
12/180
RSF 2026 · 82.77, up five places
Economic
Its lowest-scoring of the five indicators
1
Daily newspaper left in the market
Index position
The rise came as RSF recorded the lowest average level in the index’s 25-year history, with more than half of countries assessed now in the difficult or very serious categories. Norway led for a tenth consecutive year with 92.72, Denmark fourth on 88.47, Sweden fifth on 87.61 and Finland sixth on 86.22. Four Nordic countries sit in RSF’s highest category; Iceland remains close to that group but outside it
Market structure
RSF describes concentration dominated by four groups. Following the bankruptcy of a major daily, Iceland has a single daily newspaper, two weeklies, several regional papers and online outlets, with the broadcast market dominated by the public broadcaster
Fishing-sector ownership
Large fishing companies own media outlets, raising conflict-of-interest questions. Since 2019 journalists who covered the Fishrot Files — suspected corruption in Namibia involving a major fishing company — have been subjected to a smear campaign
State support
Advertising revenue, limited by the market’s small size, has fallen, and the government has provided what RSF describes as unprecedented financial support to compensate. RSF records concern that these public funds may favour large media groups to the detriment of media pluralism
Legal framework
Press freedom and access to public information are guaranteed, but application may prove deficient: RSF cites insufficiently justified restrictions on journalists’ access to natural disaster areas in 2023. Defamation and insulting foreign countries remain criminalised. Media ownership transparency is a legal requirement, and an effective self-regulatory system operates on a code of ethics
Political pressure
RSF records that the work of journalists has in recent years been the subject of virulent criticism in Parliament, perceived by some reporters as political pressure, and that journalists in local media are more vulnerable to influence from local authorities and businesses than their national counterparts
The mapped entry
RÚV, an opinbert hlutafélag wholly owned by the state under Act No. 23/2013, with nine voting directors nominated by Parliament. The broadcasting fee enters the Treasury and returns as an annual appropriation, supplying approximately 68 per cent of 2025 operating revenue
Published accounts of Iceland’s 2025 position differ, some giving seventeenth and others eighteenth; this follows RÚV’s own reporting of a rise from seventeenth. Sources: Reporters Without Borders 2026 Index and Iceland country page; RÚV reporting, 30 April 2026; Iceland Review; NordiskPost; Act No. 23/2013; RÚV 2025 consolidated accounts. Classification per the State Media Matrix.
Press freedom
Iceland · RSF 2026
12/180
Rank ▲ 5 places from 17th
Economic
Its weakest of the five indicators
2019
Fishrot smear campaign running since
A rise within a record decline
Iceland climbed five places while RSF recorded the lowest average level in the index’s 25-year history, with more than half of the countries and territories assessed now classified as having a difficult or very serious situation. Norway led for a tenth consecutive year with 92.72, Denmark fourth on 88.47, Sweden fifth on 87.61 and Finland sixth on 86.22. Four Nordic countries sit in RSF’s highest category; Iceland remains close to that group but outside it. Published accounts of its 2025 position differ, some giving seventeenth and others eighteenth; this follows RÚV’s own reporting of a rise from seventeenth.
Market economics
RSF describes concentration dominated by four groups. After the bankruptcy of a major daily, Iceland has a single daily newspaper, two weeklies, several regional papers and online outlets, with the broadcast market dominated by the public broadcaster. Advertising revenue, limited by the market’s size, has fallen
Fishing-sector ownership
Large fishing companies own media outlets, raising conflict-of-interest questions. Since 2019 journalists who covered the Fishrot Files — suspected corruption in Namibia involving a major fishing company — have been subjected to a smear campaign
State support
The government has provided what RSF describes as unprecedented financial support to compensate for falling advertising revenue. RSF records concern that these public funds may favour large media groups to the detriment of media pluralism
Legal framework
Press freedom and access to public information are guaranteed, but application may prove deficient: RSF cites insufficiently justified restrictions on journalists’ access to natural disaster areas in 2023. Defamation and insulting foreign countries remain criminalised. Media ownership transparency is required by law, and an effective self-regulatory system operates on a code of ethics
Political pressure
The work of journalists has in recent years been the subject of virulent criticism in Parliament, perceived by some reporters as a form of political pressure. Journalists in local media are more vulnerable to influence from local authorities and businesses than their national counterparts
The index uses five indicators: political environment, legal framework, economic conditions, sociocultural climate and safety of journalists. Iceland received its lowest score in the economic category, which sits directly alongside the structural condition of a very small market — a single remaining daily, four dominant groups, falling advertising revenue and state support whose distribution is itself a pluralism concern.
Sources: Reporters Without Borders 2026 World Press Freedom Index and Iceland country page; RÚV reporting, 30 April 2026; Iceland Review; NordiskPost.
Iceland ranked twelfth of 180 countries and territories in the 2026 RSF World Press Freedom Index, scoring 82.77 out of 100, up five places from seventeenth in 2025.
Economic conditions are Iceland’s weakest indicator. Of the index’s five measures, political environment, legal framework, economic conditions, sociocultural climate and safety of journalists, Iceland received its lowest score in the economic category. That finding sits directly alongside the structural condition of a very small market.
The market is small and concentrated. RSF describes an Icelandic media market characterised by concentration dominated by four groups. Following the bankruptcy of a major daily, the country has a single daily newspaper, two weeklies, several regional papers and online outlets. The broadcast market is dominated by the public broadcaster.
Ownership by the fishing sector raises conflict-of-interest questions. Since 2019 journalists who covered the Fishrot Files, suspected corruption in Namibia involving a major fishing company, have been subjected to a smear campaign.
State support for private media carries its own risk. Advertising revenue, limited by the market’s small size, has fallen, and the government has provided unprecedented financial support to the media to compensate.
Political pressure is identified in two forms. The work of journalists has in recent years been the subject of virulent criticism in Parliament, perceived by some reporters as a form of political pressure. It also notes that journalists in local media are more vulnerable to influence from local authorities and businesses than their national counterparts.
State Media Monitor maps one entry in Iceland. It sits in the independent family.
RÚV, Ríkisútvarpið, is classified Independent State-Funded and State-Managed (ISFM). Its radio service began in 1930 and television in 1966. It is an opinbert hlutafélag, a public limited company wholly owned by the Icelandic state, operating under Act No. 23/2013 alongside company law and a public-service contract.
Parliament nominates the board. RÚV has nine voting directors and nine alternates, nominated by Parliament through proportional election and elected at the annual general meeting. Staff organisations nominate one representative and an alternate with rights to speak and propose but no vote. Serving members of Parliament and municipal councils are ineligible. Stefán Jón Hafstein chairs the board, which appoints the Director-General; Stefán Eiríksson took office on 1 March 2020 and was reappointed on 21 October 2024 for a second five-year term.
The funding route determines the classification. The broadcasting fee is collected into the Treasury, and Article 14 requires an annual appropriation to RÚV of at least the budget’s estimated receipts from it. The fee is ISK 22,200 for the 2026 assessment year, falling on individuals aged 16 to 69 above an income threshold and on taxable domestic legal entities. Because the money reaches the broadcaster as a government appropriation rather than directly, the entry is state-funded rather than Independent Public.
In 2025 RÚV reported operating revenue of ISK 9,389 million, of which the state contribution supplied ISK 6,366 million, approximately 68 per cent, with advertising and sponsorship at approximately 27 per cent. The year closed with a net profit of ISK 14 million after a loss of ISK 188 million in 2024. Revenue rose 2.6 per cent nominally but fell 1.4 per cent in real terms, and average full-time-equivalent employment declined from 275 to 269.
RÚV’s presence in the advertising market is the central policy question. Its public-service contract for 2024 to 2027 carries an accompanying declaration committing the parties to work towards reducing its activity in the competitive market. Advertising and sponsorship revenue was almost unchanged nominally between 2024 and 2025 and fell in real terms, which does not by itself establish whether that commitment has been fulfilled.
Two legislative proposals would change the position. A private members’ bill reintroduced on 11 September 2026 would convert RÚV into a state institution, replace its board with a seven-member broadcasting council and give the minister authority to appoint the Director-General on the council’s recommendation; it was referred to committee on 17 September. Separately, the government’s legislative programme schedules an October bill deducting from RÚV’s appropriation an amount equivalent to 10 per cent of its inflation-adjusted average advertising revenue over the preceding four financial years, capping its advertising subsidiary at a four-year average and removing statutory minimum channel requirements.
Editorial independence is a statutory duty with external review. Article 3 requires RÚV to remain independent of political, ideological and economic interests in its programming and editorial decisions, and requires impartiality, verification and fair treatment of differing views. The Icelandic Media Commission conducts an annual independent assessment of fulfilment of the public-service obligations — oversight of compliance rather than a certification that all output is free from political influence. RSF describes Iceland’s leading national media, including RÚV, as generally independent because of legal and internal safeguards.
One entry, and two bills that would change it
Iceland · 2026
Independent State-Funded and State-Managed · 1
RÚV · Independent State-Funded and State-Managed
Ríkisútvarpið, an opinbert hlutafélag wholly owned by the Icelandic state, operating under Act No. 23/2013 alongside company law and a public-service contract. Radio began in 1930 and television in 1966. Nine voting directors and nine alternates are nominated by Parliament through proportional election; staff organisations nominate one representative with rights to speak and propose but no vote, and serving members of Parliament and municipal councils are ineligible. Stefán Jón Hafstein chairs the board, which appoints the Director-General; Stefán Eiríksson took office on 1 March 2020 and was reappointed on 21 October 2024.
Two proposals, neither yet law
Governance, 11 September 2026
A private members’ bill would convert RÚV into a state institution, replace its board with a seven-member broadcasting council, and give the minister authority to appoint the Director-General on the council’s recommendation. Referred to committee on 17 September.
Funding, scheduled for October
A government bill would deduct from the appropriation an amount equivalent to 10 per cent of inflation-adjusted average advertising revenue over the preceding four financial years, cap RÚV’s advertising subsidiary at a four-year average and remove statutory minimum channel requirements.
The first would bear directly on the state-managed condition by moving the Director-General’s appointment to the minister; the second would change the funding formula on which the classification rests. Neither had become law at the review date.
Why state-funded rather than public
The broadcasting fee is collected into the Treasury, and Article 14 requires an annual appropriation of at least the budget’s estimated receipts from it. The fee is ISK 22,200 for 2026, falling on individuals aged 16 to 69 above an income threshold and on taxable domestic legal entities. Because the money reaches the broadcaster as a government appropriation rather than directly, the entry is state-funded rather than Independent Public.
Editorial duty and its review
Article 3 requires RÚV to remain independent of political, ideological and economic interests in programming and editorial decisions, with impartiality, verification and fair treatment of differing views. The Icelandic Media Commission conducts an annual independent assessment of fulfilment of the public-service obligations — oversight of compliance rather than a certification that all output is free from political influence.
In 2025 RÚV reported operating revenue of ISK 9,389 million, of which the state contribution supplied ISK 6,366 million, approximately 68 per cent, with advertising and sponsorship at approximately 27 per cent. The year closed with a net profit of ISK 14 million after a loss of ISK 188 million in 2024. Revenue rose 2.6 per cent nominally but fell 1.4 per cent in real terms, and average full-time-equivalent employment declined from 275 to 269. The public-service contract for 2024 to 2027 carries an accompanying declaration committing the parties to work towards reducing RÚV’s activity in the competitive market; advertising and sponsorship revenue was almost unchanged nominally between 2024 and 2025 and fell in real terms, which does not by itself establish whether that commitment has been fulfilled.
Sources: Act No. 23/2013, articles 3, 9 and 14; parliamentary record, 11 and 17 September 2026; government legislative programme 2026 to 2027; RÚV 2025 consolidated accounts; Icelandic tax authority. ISFM = Independent State-Funded and State-Managed, per the State Media Matrix.
Media profiles