Bhutan

Bhutan

Asia · South Asia
1 SC
BBS
1 ISM
Kuensel
150/180
RSF 2026 · very serious
1992
Both delinked
Outlets mapped
2 — Bhutan Broadcasting Service (national radio and television broadcaster); Kuensel (national newspaper)
Defining feature
Both organisations were delinked from government by royal instrument in 1992; neither received statutory protection, and they have diverged on funding and practice rather than on law
State holding
Both are under majority state ownership — BBS wholly state-owned, with the Ministry of Finance as sole shareholder; Kuensel 51% government-owned, with 49% held by private, institutional and employee shareholders
Legal framework
The ICM Act 2018 designates BBS the public service broadcaster and requires a governing charter, which has never been adopted. No right-to-information law. The independent Media Council was dissolved in 2023. Under the Act the minister appoints BICMA’s members from government bodies and sectoral nominees, so the regulator is not structurally independent of the executive
Political context
Parliamentary democracy since 2008 with a constitutional guarantee of press freedom; Prime Minister Tshering Tobgay’s People’s Democratic Party in office since January 2024
Typology change 2026
None — BBS remains State-Controlled and Kuensel remains Independent State-Managed/Owned

Sources: RSF World Press Freedom Index 2026; Information, Communications and Media Act 2018; National Council Social and Cultural Affairs Committee (2024); signed-off BBS and Kuensel profiles (July 2026). Classification per State Media Monitor.

Press freedom — Bhutan

RSF Index 2026
150/180
Score 33.50 · band 0–39
Very serious
Five-year trajectory
−117 places since 2022
33rd
2022
90th
2023
147th
2024
152nd
2025
150th
2026
A two-place gain in 2026 against a four-year collapse from 33rd — among the steepest declines in South Asia.
Sub-indicator ranks, with movement from 2025
Political
133rd
▲ 28
Social
173rd
▲ 1
Security
95th
▼ 12
Economic · legislative
Ranks not published in accessible 2026 reporting. RSF identified economic as Bhutan’s weakest category.
South Asia, 2026
87
Nepal
134
Sri Lanka
150
Bhutan
152
Bangladesh
153
Pakistan
157
India
175
Afghanistan
Bhutan is the highest-placed South Asian country in the “very serious” bracket, and RSF describes physical threats against journalists there as rare. The pressures it records are of a different kind: defamation proceedings, a national-security provision penalising attempts to create hostility between government and people, obstructed access to official information, online harassment campaigns and pervasive self-censorship. Security had been Bhutan’s strongest indicator and fell twelve places this year.

Source: RSF World Press Freedom Index 2026, released 30 April 2026, with regional tables as published by Kashmir Times and reporting by BBS and Bhutan News Network. Sub-indicator figures are ranks, not scores.

Bhutan is a democratic constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary system, and its Constitution guarantees freedom of the press, radio, television and electronic media. Unlike several countries in South Asia, Bhutan does not display a pattern of killings or mass detention of journalists, and RSF describes physical threats against them as rare. Its press-freedom problems are primarily structural, legal, economic and sociocultural, but not purely institutional: defamation proceedings, a national-security provision penalising attempts to create hostility between the government and the people, restricted access to official information, online harassment and pervasive self-censorship also constrain reporting.

Bhutan’s two mapped state-media organisations were delinked from direct government administration in 1992. A Royal Kasho granted the Bhutan Broadcasting Service operating autonomy, while a royal edict constituted Kuensel as an autonomous corporation. Neither organisation subsequently acquired a protected editorial-appointment system or an enforceable statutory firewall insulating its newsroom from the state’s ownership powers, and their institutional and editorial trajectories have diverged:

The accountability framework surrounding both outlets has weakened. Bhutan’s independent Media Council was dissolved in 2023, removing an important media self-regulation and accountability mechanism, and no right-to-information law has been enacted. Under the 2018 Act, the minister appoints the members of the Bhutan InfoComm and Media Authority from government bodies and sectoral nominees, meaning that BICMA is not structurally independent of the executive.

Bhutan’s two mapped outlets are both under majority state ownership, but their classifications reflect different evidence. BBS remains wholly state-owned, heavily dependent on government support and without the implemented governance instrument required for genuine public-service autonomy. Kuensel, despite the state’s controlling shareholding and the absence of a statutory editorial firewall, has maintained commercially financed operations and a demonstrated record of editorial autonomy in practice.

The distinction is therefore real but fragile. Kuensel’s ISM classification depends on continued evidence that the state does not use its ownership or advertising leverage to direct editorial output. BBS should remain State-Controlled until the public-service charter or by-law required by the 2018 Act is adopted and implemented with independent governance, protected appointments and enforceable editorial safeguards.

State-media architecture — Bhutan

July 2026
1992 — Royal instruments delink both organisations from government administration
A Royal Kasho for BBS and a royal edict for Kuensel · neither followed by a statutory charter
Bhutan Broadcasting Service
SC
National radio and television broadcaster
Ownership — 100% Ministry of Finance
Funding — government grants and annual performance compacts
Status — designated the public service broadcaster by the ICM Act 2018; the charter the Act requires has never been adopted
Kuensel Corporation
ISM
National newspaper · print 2×/week, digital daily
Ownership — 51% government, 49% private; listed as KCL
Funding — commercial; no direct subsidy since 1998
Status — no statutory designation; editorial autonomy sustained in practice and evidenced by independent content analysis
What neither has
Statutory charter or media-specific governing instrument
Protected procedure for appointing leadership
Enforceable editorial firewall
Independent Media Council — dissolved 2023
Right-to-information law
Why they diverge
Same origin, same absence of protection, different outcomes. BBS is wholly owned and grant-funded, and holds a public-service designation that has never been given effect. Kuensel is majority state-owned but commercially funded, with minority shareholders and a demonstrated record of autonomous reporting. The separation rests on financing, governance and demonstrated editorial practice, not on any instrument either could rely on if the state chose to intervene.

Sources: Information, Communications and Media Act 2018; Ministry of Finance state-enterprise reporting; National Council Social and Cultural Affairs Committee (2024); Media and Journalism Research Center; RSF World Press Freedom Index 2026; signed-off BBS and Kuensel profiles (July 2026). Classification per State Media Monitor.


Media profiles